Intelligent Design Garbage

Biologist Kenneth Miller destroys intelligent design by pointing out how in living creatures the function of a structure can change over time. And if the function is mutable nothing can ever be irreducibly complex. Example: The stinger in honey bees is a modified egg depositor (ovipositor), which is why male bees cannot sting. The natural world is filled with tinkering and re-tinkering, not design. But, of course, ID supporters just ignore the lack of evidence for irreducible complexity and they keep on vomiting up pseudoscientific garbage.



Filed under Intelligent Design

9 responses to “Intelligent Design Garbage

  1. Matteo

    Credulity, thy name is anyone who thinks Ken Miller has decisively refuted anything whatsoever.

  2. SoD

    Indeed in this world … Intelligent Design has faltered … but because the beautiful and shinning crystal glass was shattered when it fell to the floor … doesn’t mean it’s Superior Design didn’t exist before it’s fragments were disarranged …

    Knowing that the We of an Intelligent Mind Soul, are Beings of a ‘’Complex Designed Circuitry of Intelligent Energy’ .. and knowing that Soul is that ghost-like Energy which engulfs the Mind at all times …. and knowing that the Spirit is but the accelerated state of any energy … I am comfortable rooted in the knowledge that we were brought into existence by the Master Creator …

    We are product of the Master Creator …. A ‘’Living Entity of ‘Charged Plasma Energy’ … a Being of the greatest intelligence known and unknown …. One who did create and do hold firm the very Designed Foundation of all Worlds created … that same One who sit in Highest position of all Her Creations of 9 Universal Planes … and who in doing so established each upper and lower Planes Inner 4 Dimensional Levels … all of which are held in placed by the stabilizing accomplishments of Quantum Frequencies ….
    Of such A Creator is said …. if Her Changed Physical Form of a Shiny Black Shape Shifting Mass of Plasma unto a Voltage Form of Lightening, were to step down from Her hidden Place there in the First Dimensional Level of the First Universal Plane …. and were to take journey through our known universe of expanded darkness … Her appearance would stand as a Five Figurative Form of Blue Lightening …. taller than any known Nebula …. and that spiraling galaxies would be as tiny lily pads coupling each Her every gigantic Footsteps …. and that each lily pad of a galaxy, would buckle to fall in scattered debris at Her passing … So Knowing what I am sure of … there is no need to debate rather or not the We of Intelligent Mind Souls were Designed or a mishap of evolutionized procedures of natural developments … I stand In full knowledge of my Creator … I am just an Old Sold passing through, with something important to say ….…

    Never miss an answer for Today’s Mystical Concerns All Around Us;
    Planet X, UFOs, reptilian colonies, celestial colonies, Lucifer, rapture,
    Beelzebub, Satan, inseminated babies, clones, earth’s core ignites,
    register as a friend … ask questions … leave comments …or email me at

  3. thedarwinreport

    “Credulity, thy name is anyone who thinks Ken Miller has decisively refuted anything whatsoever.”

    He is not the only scientist making this valuable point. And I know my biology. Anyway, attacking Kenneth Miller isn’t an argument in favor of ID.

    Irreducile complexity relies on the function of a biological structure staying the same. If the function is changeable then the structure can NOT be irreducible complex. And the natural world is filled with examples of structures that have shifted their function. It’s as simple as that. There’s no getting around that argument.

    I would also point out that many biological structures have more than one fucntion.

  4. thedarwinreport

    Dear General SoD,

    I really have no idea what you said, but you used a hell of a lot a words to say it. Parsimony My Friend!

  5. Anybody hear of Sitchin and Pye? Couldn’t both evolution and ID be true?

  6. TheDarwinReport

    “Anybody hear of Sitchin and Pye? Couldn’t both evolution and ID be true?”

    Hey UFO Pilgrim,

    If I remember correctly, Pye proposed that extraterrestrials created the human race. That would intelligent design.

    A good scientific theory stimulates new questions and creates new research. ID hasn’t done either. And ID has been around a lot longer than Darwinian evolution. ID is simply not science. There’s no way to study how a god, or an alien race, designed the human race. So, it’s better to concentrate on the available evidence, not on the desired evidence.

  7. Pye calls it “Direct Intervention” not Intelligent Design.

  8. thedarwinreport

    UFO Pilgrim,

    “Pye calls it “Direct Intervention” not Intelligent Design.”

    A smelly fish by any other name is just as smelly.

  9. YAY lets play semantics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s